Tuesday, April 03, 2007

How not to do mobile marketing for fundraising

Oh dear oh dear oh dear. I've just read a press release about what should be, a neat little campaign to raise funds for a not for profit entity. It's a straightforward text to win campaign where you can win some 'money can't buy prizes' (although what these are exactly is a bit vague to say the least) and you get charged £1.50 which helps raise funds for the entity. In addition, you get sent a link to download some free games. The promotion is live and now out in the wild.

Well, I like to try this things out and see how well they work or not and found out the following...

1. I sent my text message in and got a reply quickly with a URL to download a free mobile game.

2. I clicked through to a wap page with no branding from the entity or who it was or where I was but nevertheless, downloaded a few games pretty easily. There was a good choice of games available and some links at the bottom of the page to the games company's main pages where I could search and buy other games. It even recognised my handset type!

3. BUT I don't know whether or not I was charged the £1.50 as there was no evidence of that on the text message (note, I didn't get a wap push message - just a SMS - I should have got both).

4. AND I don't know what, if anything, both the nfp entity and the games company are going to do with my mobile number in the future. Nor was there any provision for STOP to unsubscribe.

5. MOREOVER there are no terms and conditions... at all... anywhere. I scoured their website, I scoured the wapsite (which isn't theirs anyway, just a page of free games already (?) available if you know where to look on the mobile internet). I have no idea who the promoter is, how long the promotion is on for, exactly what the prizes are, what the criteria for winning are, how I know if I've won etc etc. It's all a balls up.

So, to give them the benefit of the doubt, I call up to see if they realise what they've done. They had no clue. They had no idea of their omissions or what the consequences might be. Their response was that the company supplying the technology said it was all ok and above board. Hmm. I do know of the supplier companies in question. And if that really is the case, then it seems they either don't know their onions. At all. Or can't be bothered to share what they do know about onions. Very very disappointing. And could get all of them into trouble. So shortsighted as well I'd say.

This ought be a great little promo being used to generate much needed funds and should be a bit of fun in the process. For the sake of a bit of time and effort and a bit of cash, they could have got it so right. I understand the limitations of no budget, but when you have a website which you can update yourself (they've put the press release on there), then how hard is it to put up some terms and conditions and details of the competition itself? And for a bit extra, I have no doubt at all, this could have been done on the wapsite too. And getting it right should be a reassurance factor for customers so they're more likely to spread the word about the campaign. As it stands, I expect teenagers will get hold of the URL for the free games and just pass that on to each other and completely bypass paying the £1.50 (that's if £1.50 was ever charged in the first place).

Anyway, I said I wouldn't dob them in, so I haven't mentioned the companies in question in the hope that they sort out what they need to do, and fast, as this campaign is now live and being actively promoted in their community. And I do hope they get some proper legal advice too re terms and conditions, PSMS compliance and what they *must* make available and how and to whom so they can fix the mistakes they've made.

Grrr. Mobile Marketers - pull up your socks! This is 2007 and NOT NEW any more. You really should know better. Surely we can get the basics right. No wonder the TV companies are in a pickle with SMS voting shenanigans if we can't even get a basic text to win right.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

SMS graffiti in Rome

Paul Notzold of Txtualhealing.com is doing interesting things using SMS as graffiti. The idea is that you send in your text message to the central system and then the messages are projected on to buildings (interior or exterior) in specific shapes or formats. In the recent installation in Rome, Italy, as part of the Urban Portraits programme, the text messages appeared in speech bubbles.

Art meets mobile meets social media. Very interesting...

Realeyes 3D win again

Realeyes 3D are doing some very cool things with mobile phones. By simply moving your phone, you can move around pictures and websites. You can check out how it works over at youtube. In fact, it's such a cool application, that not only did it win the Momo Global Peer Award at 3GSM in Barcelona this year, but they've also just landed a Red Herring 100 Europe award. This annual award is given to the top 100 private technology companies based in EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa). Well done Realeyes 3D and let's hope with this success, the software will be installed on more cameraphones hitting the market.

The effects of online advertising... ads are putting people off visiting a website

Ok, so it's not mobile, but it is related since we are now beginning to join the world of ad-funded content in mobile with the success of Admob and the likes of Greystripe's in-mobile-game advertising. The article linked to here describes an experiment in online advertising to see how much it affected people's likelihood to return to a site.
...Our findings suggest that advertisements do have significant effects on retention of the site. Also, advertising content that is non-congruent with the site's content seems to lead to greater effort in reconciling the differing content, and ultimately greater memory of both the Web site and the advertisement.

Intrusiveness is also important for both Web site designers and advertisers. Pop-ups and pop-unders seem to be more intrusive than in-line ads, implying that users should not be interrupted from their online tasks to close the extraneous windows....
This probably isn't news for those of us who hate pop-ups and pop-unders but having 'scientific' evidence is a step forward to drumming it home that you need congruence between the publisher, the style of ad and the product or service being advertised.

Future Technologies Conference at Oxford University 13th April 2007

Looks like the week after Easter is a busy week in mobile. Not only do we have Swedish Beers on the 11th April (courtesy of our lovely friends at Tanla Mobile) but there's also an extremely reasonably priced one-day Future Technologies conference at the University of Oxford on Friday 13th April. It's well worth a look if you're interested in mobile technology and in particular mobile web and innovation. And it's a bargain £95 for the day *including* refreshments.

Extremely useful handset and mobile web stats from m:metrics

As ever, the lovely folk at m:metrics have been doing their stuff again and have provided us with some juicy stats on the top 10 handsets in the UK by sales and by installed base. The really interesting thing for me about this is that all of the top 10 handsets by sales and 7 of the top 10 handsets by installed base have a colour screen, a camera and wap access. The future is bright, the future is mobile!

Top 10 handsets by sales (3 month average ending Jan 07) in the UK

Make

Model Name

Subscribers

Sony Ericsson

W850i

145,032

Sony Ericsson

K800i

132,978

Samsung

D900

109,752

Nokia

6230i

102,822

Samsung

E900

91,388

Nokia

N73

88,721

Sony Ericsson

K750i

87,187

LG

KG800 Chocolate

76,710

Samsung

D500

74,252

Samsung

D600

73,326

Top 10 handsets by installed base (3 month average ending Jan 07) in the UK

Make

Model Name

Subscribers

Nokia

6230i

1,614,909

Samsung

D500

981,663

Motorola

RAZR V3 Black Edition

932,762

Sony Ericsson

K800i

879,901

Nokia

6230

860,477

Sony Ericsson

K750i

792,681

Nokia

6280

781,564

Samsung

D600

774,267

Nokia

3310

769,520

Nokia

1100

744,444


They have also just announced their MeterDirect service which is the first research service to directly and continuously measure consumer mobile media behavior, unlocking mobile as a viable medium for advertisers. The first report reveals the top 5 US and UK Mobile Web Domains in February 2007.

The US sites are heavily geared towards things you would do on the internet anyway (searching, instant messaging and entertainment) whilst in the UK we're browsing the network operator sites. I wonder how much of that is an o2 user looking up what's going on on orangeworld for example or if people are loyal to their own network operator? Good to see the BBC up there though - it really is a good example of a mobile web site for usability.

Top Mobile Web Domains: February 2007
United States United Kingdom
Domain Company Domain Company
google.com Google Inc. google.co.uk Google Inc.
yahoo.com Yahoo! Inc. o2.co.uk O2 (UK) Ltd
msn.com Microsoft Corporation orange.co.uk Orange Personal Communications Services Limited
live.com Microsoft Corporation bbc.co.uk British Broadcasting Corporation
go.com The Walt Disney Company three.co.uk Hutchison 3G UK Limited